On January 17, 2025, 30 years will have passed since the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. This disaster left deep scars on Japan but also served as a turning point in raising awareness about disaster preparedness and mitigation. Over the past three decades, Japan has made significant strides in improving disaster resilience. However, challenges remain, especially in the adoption of business continuity planning (BCP). Compared to global standards, Japanese companies still lag behind in integrating comprehensive disaster strategies. This article reflects on the lessons learned from the earthquake and explores the current state and future challenges of BCP in Japan.

Lessons from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake
1. The Shock of Unprecedented Damage
The January 17, 1995 earthquake claimed approximately 6,400 lives, destroyed countless homes, and left urban infrastructure in ruins. The event underscored the catastrophic consequences of “unanticipated” large-scale earthquakes in urban areas.
2. Raising Disaster Preparedness Awareness
Following the earthquake, Japan strengthened building codes and implemented disaster response plans at both government and corporate levels. However, the concept of BCP, which ensures the continuity and recovery of business operations during disasters, has been primarily adopted by large or global corporations, leaving many small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) unprepared.
3. The Vital Role of Community Cooperation
The earthquake highlighted the importance of community support. Local residents played a pivotal role in recovery efforts, emphasizing the value of mutual aid. This has since spurred disaster training programs and community-based disaster management initiatives.

The Current State of BCP in Japan: Bridging the Gap with Global Standards
1. Low BCP Adoption Rates in Japan
In Western countries, BCP is seen as a fundamental part of risk management. In contrast, BCP adoption among Japanese companies, especially SMEs, remains low. According to the “2024 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises,” only 15.3% of SMEs in Japan had implemented a BCP as of 2023.
2. Misconceptions About BCP
BCP is often perceived as expensive or unnecessary until a disaster occurs. However, a lack of preparedness can result in prolonged business disruptions, lost customers. BCP should be viewed as an investment in the survival and resilience of a company.
3. Learning from International Practices
Western companies regularly assess risks like earthquakes and floods and conduct practical BCP drills to minimize disruption. They also promote collaboration across supply chains, fostering stronger partnerships to manage disaster risks collectively.

Our Role as a Comprehensive Disaster Management Company
1. Strengthening BCP Adoption
At SAKIGAKE JAPAN, we aim to improve BCP adoption rates among Japanese companies by offering customized solutions, from risk assessments to detailed action plans tailored to various industries and company sizes.
2. Promoting Practical Disaster Training
Effective disaster response requires preparation. We provide diverse training programs for earthquakes, typhoons, and fires, helping businesses and communities enhance their resilience.
3. Leveraging Advanced Technology for Risk Management
We support companies in adopting cutting-edge technologies like AI and IoT for earthquake forecasting and disaster management systems, enabling swift and informed decision-making.
Preparedness Begins Now
As we mark 30 years since the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, we must ensure the lessons of the past do not fade. BCP is a vital tool not just for business continuity but also for safeguarding employees, their families, and the broader community.
At SAKIGAKE JAPAN, we are committed to building a disaster-resilient future alongside businesses and local communities. Disasters strike without warning—”Preparedness Starts Now.” Let’s take action today.